https://superuser.com/questions/784978/why-did-the-ietf-specifically-choose-192-168-16-to-be-a-private-ip-address-class/785641
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jay R. Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > Does anyone have a pointer to an *authoritative* source on why > > 10/8 > 172.16/12 and > 192.168/16 > > were the ranges chosen to enshrine in the RFC? Came up elsewhere, and I > can't > find a good citation either. > > To list or I'll summarize. > > Cheers, > -- jra > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > j...@baylink.com > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land > Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 > 1274 >