----- On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Fredrik Korsbäck hu...@nordu.net wrote:
> This is the "failure" of us (the business) choosing QSFP as the de-factor > formfactor for 100G, there is not power in > that cage to make 10km+ optics in an easy way. If we would have pushed for > CFP4 > as the "last" formfactor in 100G land we > would be much better off. How about OSFP? The OSFP MSA has a large number of backers, including Juniper, Arista, Finisar and Google. It's the vendors that chose to go for QSFP due to the density options in a single RU chassis. Thanks, Sabri
