Just like "S3 dependency check day" Thus begins "National 1.1.1.1 change week" I've already around a few peaces of equipment sets with 1.1.1.1
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > Seeing as how 1.1.1.1 isn’t suppose to be routed I’m not surprised this is > causing odd issues. > > > On Apr 2, 2018, at 11:03, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> wrote: > > > > I am behind a Calix router at home for my ISP and 1.1.1.1 goes to my > router > > and not any further. When I enter the IP into my browser, it opens the > > login page for my router. So it appears 1.1.1.1 is used as a loopback in > my > > Calix router. > > > > 1.0.0.1 goes to the proper place fine. > > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy L. Gaddis <lists-na...@gadd.is> > > wrote: > > > >> Greetings, > >> > >> If anyone at 7018 wants to pass a message along to the correct folks, > >> please let them know that Cloudflare's new public DNS service (1.1.1.1) > >> is completely unusable for at least some of AT&T's customers. > >> > >> There is apparently a bug with some CPE (including the 5268AC). From > >> behind such CPE, the services at 1.1.1.1 are completely unreachable, > >> whether via (ICMP) ping, DNS, or HTTPS. > >> > >> Using the 5268AC's web-based diagnostic tools, pinging 1.1.1.1 returns > >> the following results: > >> > >> ping successful: icmp seq:0, time=2.364 ms > >> ping successful: icmp seq:1, time=1.085 ms > >> ping successful: icmp seq:2, time=1.160 ms > >> ping successful: icmp seq:3, time=1.245 ms > >> ping successful: icmp seq:4, time=0.739 ms > >> > >> RTTs to the CPE's default gateway are, at minimum, ~20 ms. > >> > >> A traceroute (using the same web-based diagnostic tool built-in to the > >> CPE) reports, simply: > >> > >> traceroute 1.1.1.1 with: 64 bytes of data > >> > >> 1: 1.1.1.1(1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com), time=0 ms > >> > >> I haven't bothered to report this to AT&T through the standard customer > >> support channels (for reasons that should be obvious to anyone who has > >> ever called AT&T's consumer/residential technical support) but if anyone > >> at AT&T wants to pass the info along to the appropriate group, it would > >> certainly be appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -Jeremy > >> > >> -- > >> Jeremy L. Gaddis > >> > >> > >> "The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is > >> $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you > >> want, send it the way the spec says to." --John Levine > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Darin Steffl > > Minnesota WiFi > > www.mnwifi.com > > 507-634-WiFi > > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook > > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> > -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983 jason.w.ku...@gmail.com