Agree with this 💯 Traffic engineering is non existent making it a pain to move your traffic besides not advertising the prefix to them
Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse <mich...@wi-fiber.io> wrote: >> >> Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane >> electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best >> providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may >> have one of the most critical infrastructures, and should be a "part-owner" >> of the internet. >> > > Fully disagree. > > 1). HE cant reach cogent on v6. Forget whos fault it is, it is a liability > for anyone that relies on HE > > 2). They dont support common bgp communities like no-export, so trying to > do TE is a mess. > > 3). They are at the center of nearly every bgp hijacking fiasco because > they dont have reasonable route controls. > > HE is a liability to us all until they fix their bgp filters > > https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2018/04/amazons-route-53-bgp-hijack/ > > > > >>> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 8:08 AM Eric Dugas <edu...@unknowndevice.ca> wrote: >>> >>> Replace Level3 with CenturyLink as they're basically taking over AS33566. >>> Would add Zayo (AS6461) to the list. >>> >>> I'm not familiar with Sparkle/Seabone to be honest as we're operating an >>> eyeball network exclusively in the NA. >>>> On May 16 2018, at 10:54 am, Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://icaruswept.com/2016/06/28/who-owns-the-internet/ >>>> >>>> >>>> .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is >>> it >>>> still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, >>> since >>>> they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet >>> presence) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Also, please tell me your feelings/experiences of Sparkle as an >> Internet >>>> uplink provider. like for 10/100 gig. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My coworker just got back from ITW/Chicago and he is considering >> Sparkle >>> as >>>> an additional Internet provider for the ISP I work for in San Antonio, >>> TX . >>>> we would need to uplink to Sparkle in the central Texas area somehow. >> He >>>> mentioned that Sparkle may be in McAllen / Dallas and could possibly, >> in >>> the >>>> future be in Austin or San Antonio >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Aaron >>> >>