What sort of regulations and what sort of associated costs are you talking about, if we can be specific?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:26 AM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 05:55, Rob McEwen <r...@invaluement.com> wrote: > >> Meanwhile, global warming > >> alarmists have ALREADY made MANY dire predictions about oceans levels > >> rising - that ALREADY didn't even come close to true. > > > > Now this discussion does not belong to NANOG, but 'global warming > > alarmist' is worrying term to me. What is the perceived harm you're > > trying to reduce? > > Government regulation which results in increased costs. > > Climate science is interesting and worthy, but it's still too shaky > and incomplete to justify trillion dollar decisions. > > For anyone who would have us Act Now Before It's Too Late, alarmist is > the right term. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> >
