I bet you can search the nanog list archive and find this very discussion topic surface about ever 8-12 months... folk always fall in this trap (or a form of it): "Welp, we've had 1 too many people in $CORP get infected via email, spam filter all the things!!!" ... wait... "Oh, yea duh.. our spam/abuse alias can't block spam.. because people will send us email they get that has spam/viruses/etc in it..whoops!!"
this 'always' happens, and we discuss it every 8-12 months. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:18 PM Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io> wrote: > Seemed pretty clear to me. He sent an abuse report to ab...@psychz.net and > it was rejected as spam. > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 8:11 PM Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > > > Dan, > > > > Are you saying Nanog if spamming you? It's not at all clear what your > > complaint is. > > > > -mel via cell > > > > > On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Brian Kantor <br...@ampr.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:19:22PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > > >> can we please just stop this nonsense? > > >> > > >> ip under your direct control originates sewage. you should accept > > reports as-is. > > >> > > >> requiring victims of your sewage to go through special contortions to > > >> report it to you is not acceptable. > > >> > > >>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > >>> <ab...@psychz.net> > > >>> (reason: 550 "The mail server detected your message as spam and has > > prevented delivery.") > > > > > > > > > ab...@fsec.or.kr and c...@fsec.or.kr do the same thing. > > > - Brian > > > > > >