Guys, I'm not asking about IPv6. I'm simply asking for a contact at OpenDNS.
And we are purchasing enough IPv4 space to provide an IP to every customer but it's not ready yet. Thank you On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 6:31 AM Matt Hoppes <mattlists@ > rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > >> So don't CGNat? Buy IPv4 addresses at auction? >> > > As long as you don’t deploy ipv6, you should be good. > > Seriously. Not sure why this is so hard. IPv4 does not scale. Your > customers, like my customers, probably mostly go to Youtube, google, fb, > netflix, .... all which have ipv6. Giving your existing customers ipv6 > moves this traffic off your cgn. And gives them a path to dns services. > > But you do you. if you ask NANOG, how to solve this problem, and missed > the 3 NANOG meeting presos at every meeting about how ipv6 is good .... not > sure what you expect here. Definately not a shoulder to cry on, but i wm > sure some v4 brokers and cgn box pushers see your customers blood in the > water. > > CB > >> >> On 9/11/18 9:28 AM, Ca By wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 6:04 AM Matt Hoppes >> > <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net >> > <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: >> > >> > That isn’t a solution. He still will need to dual stack and CGNat >> that. >> > >> > >> > But the flows that can support ipv6, will go ipv6 and not be subject to >> > these abuse triggers. >> > >> > Look, this list has monthly reports from some small network operator >> > hurting their customers with CGN NAT. Meanwhile, the big guys like >> > Comcast / Charter / ATT / Cox have moved onto ipv6. >> > >> > Where does that leave the little guy with CGN? >> > >> > Right here. Screaming into the avoid begging for help. Some special >> > exception. >> > >> > And, me, saying you had 10+ years of not deploying ipv6. Here’s to the >> > next 10 years of you email this list about your own failure to keep up >> > with the times. >> > >> > We will have this discussion again and again. Not sure your customers >> > will stick around, all they know is your CGN space got black listed >> from >> > yet another service >> > >> > #realtalk >> > >> > >> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 08:54, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:12 PM Darin Steffl >> >> <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com <mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I have a ticket open with OpenDNS about filtering happening on >> >> some of our CGNAT IP space where a customer has "claimed" the >> >> IP as theirs so other customers using that same IP and OpenDNS >> >> are being filtered and not able to access sites that fall >> >> under their chosen filter. >> >> >> >> I have a ticket open from 6 days ago but it's not going >> >> anywhere fast. >> >> >> >> Can someone from OpenDNS contact me or point me to a contact >> >> there to help get this resolved? I believe we need to claim >> >> our CGNAT IP space so residential users can't claim IP's of >> >> their own. >> >> >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> >> >> You should provide your users ipv6, opendns supports ipv6 and >> >> likely will not have this issue you see >> >> >> >> https://www.opendns.com/about/innovations/ipv6/ >> >> >> >> I am sure it may cost you time / money / effort. But this old >> >> thing we call ipv4 is in a death spiral, and it will just get >> >> worse and worse for you without ipv6. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Darin Steffl >> >> Minnesota WiFi >> >> www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/> >> >> 507-634-WiFi >> >> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook >> >> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >> >> >> > -- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
