On 1/Oct/18 01:21, John Curran wrote:
> > > > It is possible to architect the various legalities surrounding RPKI to > support any of the above outcomes, but it first requires a shared > understanding of what the network community believes is the correct > outcome. There is likely some on the nanog mailing list who have a > view on this matter, so I pose the question of "who should be > responsible" for consequences of RPKI RIR CA failure to this list for > further discussion. John, in the instance where all RIR's transition to a single "All Resource" TA, what would, in your mind, be the (potential) liability considerations? Mark.
