On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote: > I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer technologies > such as 464XLAT, and have had some responses indicating they will > investigate internally, however we have not made much progress yet. One > vendor suggested their device supports NAT46 and NAT64 so may support > 464XLAT, but since it is incidental rather than an official feature, it > may not support the full CLAT requirements. I have been meaning to do > some tests but haven’t had a chance yet. It is also a higher price point > than our current CPEs. > > > > I have spoken to people who have looked into options such as OpenWRT > (which supports several of these technolgoies), however the R&D and > ongoing support is a significant roadblock to overcome. >
We looked into this somewhat intently ~6 months ago and had not much luck from vendors. Barely on their radar if at all. We used our own custom OpenWRT build on a few select, tested consumer routers to do 464XLAT. In the end we went to dual-stack with CGN on IPv4. I wrote up some documentation on how we did it on my blog, but in the end I can't recommend the setup we used. I would love RouterOS and (various mfgr) CPE support for 464XLAT, then I would be ready to give it another shot.
