I'm curious, If the highjacked prefix is a /24 (subset of your much larger /22) and you can only tie the highjacked prefix, at that point how effective is the mitigation outside of a default bgp route selection process?
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Vasileios Kotronis Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 11:23 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Real-time BGP hijacking detection: ARTEMIS-1.0.0 just released Dear operators, FORTH's INSPIRE group and CAIDA are delighted to announce the public release of the ARTEMIS BGP prefix hijacking detection tool, available as open-source software at https://github.com/FORTH-ICS-INSPIRE/artemis ARTEMIS is designed to be operated by an AS in order to monitor BGP for potential hijacking attempts against its own prefixes. The system detects such attacks within seconds, enabling immediate mitigation. The current release has been tested at a major greek ISP, a dual-homed edge academic network, and a major US R&E backbone network. We would be happy if you'd give it a try and provide feedback. Feel free to make pull requests on GitHub and help us make this a true community project. ARTEMIS is funded by European Research Council (ERC) grant agreement no. 338402 (NetVolution Project), the RIPE NCC Community Projects 2017, the Comcast Innovation Fund, US NSF grants OAC-1848641 and CNS-1423659 and US DHS S&T contract HHSP233201600012C. Best regards, Vasileios -- ======================================= Vasileios Kotronis Postdoctoral Researcher, member of the INSPIRE Group INSPIRE = INternet Security, Privacy, and Intelligence REsearch Telecommunications and Networks Lab (TNL) Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) Leoforos Plastira 100, Heraklion 70013, Greece e-mail : vkotro...@ics.forth.gr url: http://inspire.edu.gr =======================================
