Speaking of which, the Grant County Public Utility District (Washington
State), has wired active ethernet all over their rural county.
Seems to me that the cost difference between splitters & switches is a
pretty minor component of deploying FTTH - the costs are in the
trenching, and the fiber. What you put on the poles, or in the lawn
furniture, is a pretty minor cost component. Though... getting power to
the switches might be an issue, less so if you're deploying on power poles.
Miles Fidelman
On 2/9/19 12:59 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Mark Tinka wrote:
If I had to build a consumer broadband network and had the budget
(and owned the fibre) to do so, I'd definitely always choose Active-E:
For anyone saying it's "impossible" to do AE they're welcome here to
the nordic region and especially Sweden where PON is basically unheard
of. We have millions of AE connected households. I live in one of them.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra