On 14/Feb/19 14:04, Alain Hebert wrote: > Hi, > > Unlucky as always, we had issues with the chassis of a MX104 about > every years since we installed. Are you using the MX104 as a route reflector? If so, make one of the VM's your alternative for this function :-). If you're not doing any non-Ethernet services on your MX104, and are struggling with the control plane, I'd propose moving to the MX204. Mark.
- BGP topological vs centralized route reflector Mohammad Khalil
- Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector Saku Ytti
- Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflecto... Mark Tinka
- Re: BGP topological vs centralized route refl... Alain Hebert
- Re: BGP topological vs centralized route ... Mark Tinka
- RE: BGP topological vs centralized r... Aaron Gould
- Re: BGP topological vs centraliz... Mark Tinka
- MX204 applications, (was abo... Saku Ytti
- Re: MX204 applications, (was... Mark Tinka
- RE: MX204 applications, (was... Phil Lavin
- Re: MX204 applications, (was... Saku Ytti
- RE: MX204 applications, (was... Phil Lavin
- Re: MX204 applications, (was... Mark Tinka
- RE: MX204 applications, (was... adamv0025
- RE: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector adamv0025