On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 8:05 PM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <g...@dombox.org> wrote:
> These guys always are the know-it-all assholes. They don't listen. They don't > want to listen. I would simply like to remind everyone that NANOG is a Mailing list that has some rules. They could be found here: https://www.nanog.org/list I would like to request for the Communications Committee to look at this thread, except the list of NANOG Committee members seems to be secret - https://nanog.org/governance/cc The message I reply to seems to be a long string of major deviations from AUP, specifically: : 4. Postings that are defamatory, abusive, profane, threatening, or include foul language, : character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are prohibited. We get really tired about people bringing up disputes and personal issues -- this is not the right place. > Long story short.... I solved the email spam problem. Well... Actually I > solved it long time back. I'm just ready to disclose it today. Again... While you have some technical solution and some ideas that appear to have merit such as "Isolated mailboxes" (Isolated Mailboxes are not really a new idea -- but there is currently no agreed protocol/standard to make such function convenient enough for people to use); Prompting e-mail senders to answer "CAPTCHA" sounds too burdensome to use; This is also not Spam-Free, as spammers will find ways to answer CAPTCHAs. The overall claims to have "zero" spam or completely "solved" the spam problem technically are way too bold and are close to "Product Marketing" in my view, since some Dombox dot com service is being advertised. Most Network Operators like those that subscribe to NANOG usually have little to say about technical details involved in developing standards regarding e-mail protocols; please see IETF for on-topic discussion groups. -- -JH
