Well, It has been a challenge. I am not sure who helped or fixed the problem, but now anything hosted on softlayer.com is responding.
I am not sure if there was anyone lurking on the list that helped out, but if you are, Thank You. I have a batch of new stuff not working, but they may be one off's. I am trying to find a pattern. John On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:32 PM Travis Garrison <tgarri...@netviscom.com> wrote: > Traceroute from here if it helps > > > > Tracing route to 138-43-128-1.reserved.highland.net [138.43.128.1] > > over a maximum of 30 hops: > > > > 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] > > 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] > > 3 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] > > 4 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms [REDACTED] > > 5 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms v313.core1.mci3.he.net [216.218.213.141] > > 6 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms 100ge10-2.core1.dal1.he.net > [184.105.81.206] > > 7 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms > xo-as15-as2828.10gigabitethernet6-7.core1.dal1.he.net [184.105.255.78] > > 8 40 ms 39 ms 40 ms 207.88.14.198.ptr.us.xo.net > [207.88.14.198] > > 9 40 ms 39 ms 40 ms 207.88.12.178.ptr.us.xo.net > [207.88.12.178] > > 10 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 216.156.16.239.ptr.us.xo.net > [216.156.16.239] > > 11 48 ms 48 ms 48 ms > ip65-46-198-198.z198-46-65.customer.algx.net [65.46.198.198] > > 12 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms > occm-6.dhcp.grp1-rng1.tncsvl.blomand.net.57.131.192.in-addr.arpa > [192.131.57.6] > > 13 * * * Request timed out. > > > > Thanks > > Travis > > > > *From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> *On Behalf Of *Siyuan Miao > *Sent:* Friday, March 22, 2019 9:22 AM > *To:* Nikolas Geyer <n...@neko.id.au> > *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: softlayer.com > > > > Perhaps it won't work because their customer support will ask you for > bi-directional traceroute and refused to forward to backbone team. > > > > Then they'll say it's not their fault and you can see the packet is > dropped outside our network. > > > > Here's a sample traceroute from SoftLayer Washington, San Jose and Seattle > in case someone needs it: > > > > aveline@iad02-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide > > Start: Fri Mar 22 17:20:42 2019 > > HOST: iad02-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg > Best Wrst StDev > > 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 1.4 > 1.5 0.8 3.7 1.0 > > 2.|-- ae13.dar02.wdc01.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 0.5 > 3.3 0.4 28.6 8.8 > > 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 0.8 > 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.0 > > 4.|-- eqix-dc5.intellifiber.com 0.0% 10 0.8 > 1.2 0.8 2.2 0.3 > > 5.|-- ae13-0.cr02.asbn01-va.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 0.9 > 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.0 > > 6.|-- ae11-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 15.6 > 16.1 15.6 17.4 0.5 > > 7.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 17.4 > 16.1 15.9 17.4 0.3 > > 8.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net 0.0% 10 24.7 > 24.8 24.6 24.9 0.0 > > 9.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net 0.0% 10 22.6 > 22.8 22.5 23.8 0.0 > > 10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 > > > > aveline@sjc03-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide > > Start: Fri Mar 22 16:21:04 2019 > > HOST: sjc03-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg > Best Wrst StDev > > 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 2.4 > 2.0 0.3 14.3 4.3 > > 2.|-- ae0.dar02.sjc01.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 1.0 > 0.5 0.3 1.3 0.0 > > 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 0.8 > 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.0 > > 4.|-- eqix-sv1.windstream.com 0.0% 10 0.9 > 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.0 > > 5.|-- ae6-0.cr02.lsaj01-ca.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 11.6 > 11.5 11.5 11.6 0.0 > > 6.|-- ae-11-0.cr01.dlls01-tx.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 42.6 > 42.7 42.5 43.4 0.0 > > 7.|-- ae7-0.cr02.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 64.0 > 65.6 63.9 74.2 3.4 > > 8.|-- ae1-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 62.3 > 62.7 62.2 66.9 1.5 > > 9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net 0.0% 10 71.9 > 72.0 71.9 72.2 0.0 > > 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net 0.0% 10 69.9 > 68.8 68.6 69.9 0.3 > > 11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 > > > > aveline@sea04-sl01:~$ mtr 138.43.128.1 --report-wide > > Start: Fri Mar 22 08:19:09 2019 > > HOST: sea04-sl01 Loss% Snt Last Avg > Best Wrst StDev > > 1.|-- [REDACTED] 0.0% 10 0.7 > 1.2 0.7 1.8 0.0 > > 2.|-- ae12.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 0.6 > 0.7 0.5 1.3 0.0 > > 3.|-- ae9.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com 0.0% 10 1.2 > 1.0 0.7 1.5 0.0 > > 4.|-- six.seattle-wa.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 1.5 > 1.0 0.7 1.7 0.0 > > 5.|-- ae12-0.cr01.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 41.1 > 41.2 41.0 41.6 0.0 > > 6.|-- ae17-0.cr02.chcg01-il.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 41.1 > 41.4 41.1 42.0 0.0 > > 7.|-- ae10-0.cr01.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 63.8 > 64.4 63.5 71.1 2.3 > > 8.|-- ae0-0.pe06.atln02-ga.us.windstream.net 0.0% 10 63.7 > 63.7 63.5 64.0 0.0 > > 9.|-- h43.88.198.64.static.ip.windstream.net 0.0% 10 71.6 > 71.8 71.5 72.8 0.0 > > 10.|-- east.tndodge-21.static.tncsvl.blomand.net 0.0% 10 71.8 > 70.8 70.2 71.8 0.3 > > 11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 > > > > > > Regards, > > Siyuan Miao > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:10 PM Nikolas Geyer <n...@neko.id.au> wrote: > > This is the best approach. Have run into this problem a few times and had > zero success getting the filters removed without having SL customers log > tickets with support. Verbiage needs to be “this prefix is blocked, please > escalate to your backbone team”. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < > li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > > Another idea... > > > > Have you tried reaching out to some of the blocked sites? They likely > have better contact information than is available publicly, especially a > larger one like indeed. > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 3:41 PM John Alcock <j...@alcock.org> wrote: > > Still looking for anyone from softlayer.com > > > > It has been a challenge. Anything hosted by softlayer.com is being > blocked. > > > > Here is a small list so far > > > > windowbook.tpondemand.com > ahainstructornetwork.americanheart.org > clover.com > Cebroker.com > Softlayer.com > indeed.com & Enforce Staffing > > > > It is growing every day. > > > > John > > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:35 PM John Alcock <j...@alcock.org> wrote: > > Afternoon, > > > > Thought I would start a new thread. After researching, traceroutes, etc, > I think I found my problem. > > > > 9 out of the 10 sites that subscribers on my new block is being hosted by > softlayer. > > > > Anyone on the list have contacts with softlayer. Right now I have an > email to abuse. The support line will not help me out. > > > > John > >