Randy, Alain, > > o nat-pt with standardized algs for at least dns, smtp, http, sip, and > rtp > > > -->> This is on my top 3 hot topics. And make it works both way, v4 to > v6 and v6 to v4. > And also don’t call it NAT-PT. That name is dead.
For what it is worth, this is one of the things that I want to do. I don't want to give you an impression that NAT-PT++ will solve all the IPv6 transition issues; I suspect dual stack is a better answer. But nevertheless, the IETF needs to produce a revised spec for the translation case. Fred and I are organizing an effort to do this. Jari
