On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:41:55 +0900, Randy Bush said:
> consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperabilty for a "notmail" 
> system where following the specs was thrown to the wind.

I think that's what *started* this thread, isn't it?

Attachment: pgpBR5QHgVFv2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to