Yep. That makes sense; it works that way now. Well, the error stream isn't yet, but that is cause when I had it in there and the error stream was empty. So I left it with stdError going to the console.
> I see. That's what I was thinking about. I do have one suggestion, though: > We should modify the ExternalProgramBase class to ensure that when the > external tool is run, we capture the output and error streams and log > that, > too. Otherwise things will get really annoying, and not all we (or at > least > I) would like would be registered in the logs. > > Does that make sense? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
