Don't think there would be any real benefit in this case, except saving space/typing when you need to execute several cvs tasks in a row and having a more structured layout ...
I just like the way the Ant ejbjar (http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/ejb.html) and serverdeploy (http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/serverdeploy.html) tasks are structured and implemented ... But as I said, I haven't thought about the consequences of implementing something like this yet ... It would be a nightmare for our task doc generator, I'm sure.. Gert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "brian.nantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks > Really, > What is the benefit of nesting everything under a cvs tag ? apart from > having common settings but you could do that with properties anyway. > > Ian > > >I'd rather move to the following task layout for the cvs tasks, but I > >haven't yet looked at implementing it : > > > ><cvs cvsroot="..." password="..." ....> > > <update destination="..." /> > > <checkout .... /> > ></cvs> > > > >if you get my point ... > > > >Gert > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "brian.nantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:10 PM > >Subject: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks > > > > > >I am writing a book that has a chapter devoted to nAnt. As an example of > >extending nAnt, I thought I would take Clayton's suggestion ( > ><http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2537223&forum_id=86 3 > > > > > >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=2537223&forum_id=863 ) > >and develop a Subversion Task. I have the checkout task building and > >somewhat working. My question is should I structure it similar to the CVS > >tasks? This would seem logical, but since I have never used the CVS task I > >was wondering if anyone out there found its features lacking or the design > >flawed in any way. I am assuming not so I am heading down the path of > >structuring the task just like CVS. > > > > > > > >PS - If you are interested in giving feedback for the chapter on nAnt send > >me an email off list and I will try to work it out with the publisher. > > > > > > > >Brian > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >www.nantz.org <http://www.nantz.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >Welcome to geek heaven. > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >_______________________________________________ > >nant-developers mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
