It might be necessary to move the registry-reading functionality to a
separate Win32-only task DLL.
I'm not sure what the NAnt policy w.r.t. registry-reading tasks has been
lately, but it seems that we are keeping Win32-dependent tasks separate
from platform-independent ones.
Ian or Gert - can you provide some input?
Thanks,
Matt.
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 03:16, Martin Aliger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1/ true and agree. I write it pretty quickly. Could you (or someone else)
> write that configuration stuff?
>
> 2/ yes. thanks to point it out!
>
> 3/ I want to simulate same behavior as Visual Studio. Dependancy on registry
> read could be problem but if you use <solution> task it is very propable
> that you use machine with Visual Studio. Of course - it _should_ be ok to
> run it on mono as well (skiping registry read?). Your idea with
> includevsfolders atribute is good, but I still think that default value
> should be true.
>
> Thanks you, Jarek, for review. I'll revise my code today and address all
> your comments.
>
> Martin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
>
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
> > problems:
> >
> > 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
> > registry keys to consider:
> >
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> >
> > where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I think
> > that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> > configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply have
> no
> > paths to examine.
> >
> > 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
> >
> > + FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> > + if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> > +
> > + foreach(string path in
> > _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> > + {
> > + fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> > + if ( fiRef.Exists )
> > + {
> > + _referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> > + _baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > You initialize local variable "af" to some fileset but iterate over
> > "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
> > used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
> af.DirectoryNames)"
> >
> > 3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
> > "DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:
> >
> > + if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> >
> > I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified
> in
> > the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when the
> > user asks for it"
> >
> > You would have a syntax like this.
> >
> > <solution includevsfolders="true">
> > </solution>
> >
> > I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it
> otherwise
> > would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
> > registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build
> machines.
> >
> > Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
> > Martin. You're very close, though.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> > Subject: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
> >
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I implement that <assemblyfolder> subtag for <solution> as we discused
> it
> > > here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm
> > also
> > > totally confused by security checks. Have you any experience with
> enabling
> > > read from registry? [it is ok for me without it, but...]
> > >
> > > There will be some other matters regarding project dependencies and
> paths
> > > but I need to explore it first.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Matthew Mastracci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
