Erv, I actually removed the waitforstatus attribute (I still have it on my local copy), as it wasn't really necessary ... I'll think about adding the Restart action, good idea.
Gert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erv Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:36 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task Great Idea. I'd love to get a few more <exec> tasks out of my builds. My only suggestion would be to include a "Restart" action (which would be equivalent to Stop followed by Start with the appropriate waitforstatuses). -----Original Message----- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:50 AM To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) Subject: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task Hi, I'm thinking about adding a task for stopping/starting/pausing/continueing a service, and at the same time waiting for it to reach a certain status. It would look something like this : <servicecontroller service="iisadmin" action="Start | Stop | Continue | Pause" waitforstatus="Paused | Running | ...." waittimeout="..." /> As the name suggests, I would use the servicecontroller task to implement this task, which should make it pretty straightforward. Ofcourse, this task will be win32-specific, and as such would be part of the NAnt.Win32 namespace and assembly. Any remarks, suggestions, ... ? Gert ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
