+1 for BSD. But lets post it up here for everyones reference: <license> Copyright (c) 2003, NAnt Project All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Neither the name of the NAnt project nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. </license> I have one question about the wording though. The section "Redistribution and USE (my emphasis) in source and binary forms". Does this mean that if I build a set of tasks and compile them into a separate assembly, but don't ship the NAnt libraries along with them (I assume the people I am sending to already have them) I still have to ship this license? Its not a major issue because I don't intend to profit from the libraries - but its just one more thing I have to put in the bundle (I want to be legally covered). ---------------------------------------- - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - > -----Original Message----- > From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:18 AM > To: Ian MacLean; Stefan Bodewig > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:54 PM > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing > > > > Thanks for the info Stefan, > > I tend to agree with you re FSF and associated philosophy. > > > > There sould be no reason we can't get the licencing change > in for the > > next release - assuming we can deal with any copyright > holder issues. > > So now we need to make the official dicision as to which > licence. I'm > > leaning towards BSD - what are everyone elses thoughts ? > > I would also prefer BSD, unless there's a slight chance that > Apache is going to accept .NET projects :-) > > Gert > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > nant-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
