Ian, Thanks,
Gius_. > Gius, > Hmm - well it previously wasn't correct - NAnt would give an error if > you tried to re-define a fileset. I've just made the changes so that you > can now re-define any datatype refererence. Same behaviour as properties. > > Ian > > Giuseppe Greco wrote: > >>Hi All, >>Hi Ian, >> >>What have you decided about filesets redefinition? >>Is semantically still correct that NAnt complies >>when redefining existing <fileset>s? >> >>Gius_. >> >> > > > ---------------------------------------- Giuseppe Greco ::agamura:: phone: +41 (0)91 604 67 65 mobile: +41 (0)76 390 60 32 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.agamura.com ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
