Sorry! That was a think-o on my part. I meant resource code. Should have read:

"It would be nice to move the *resource* code into a ... "

Been a tough week ;)

Matt.

Gert Driesen wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: verbosity of some tasks




That would be cool.  It would be nice to move the reference code into a
common place (the <csc> and <vbc> tasks) to avoid code duplication.


Not sure if we need this for the compiler tasks, as you should actually
supply it with the assemblies that you want to reference ...

I don't think these tasks should contain any logic for determining other
dependencies, so there won't be any code duplication.

Gert





------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to