Jarek,

We eventually will need to generate the (Common)AssemblyInfo.cs from our
build file (using the <asminfo> task), that would also resolve this issue
...

In order to accomplish this, we'll need a <version> task (similar to the one
in NAntContrib) that can match the incrementing behaviour of the
AssemblyVersionAttribute.  So, we'll either need to create a new task (or
function ofcourse) or extend the NAntContrib one ...

Gert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-880233 ] Nant unit test fails


> Gert!
>
> Regarding this ShowHelp issue: why don't we just disable the test and
let's
> (somehow) embed the build date into the NAnt.exe so that it displays in
the
> copyright banner. How about a #define that would be passed to <csc> ?
>
> Jarek
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "SourceForge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:03 PM
> Subject: [nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-880233 ] Nant unit test fails
>
>
> > Bugs item #880233, was opened at 2004-01-20 00:25
> > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
> > You can respond by visiting:
> >
>
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=880233&group_id=31650
> >
> > >Category: Tests
> > >Group: 0.8.4.0
> > >Status: Closed
> > >Resolution: Wont Fix
> > Priority: 5
> > Submitted By: Nigel Thorne (nigelthorne)
> > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> > Summary: Nant unit test fails
> >
> > Initial Comment:
> > ShowHelp fails as it is year specific.
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > >Comment By: Gert Driesen (drieseng)
> > Date: 2004-01-25 23:03
> >
> > Message:
> > Logged In: YES
> > user_id=707851
> >
> > This is a known "issue" in the 0.84 release (and all previous
> > releases actually) as we have a unit test to ensure that we
> > increment the copyright year.
> >
> > We still have to discuss how to proceed with this issue.
> >
> > Thanks for the report !
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > You can respond by visiting:
> >
>
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=880233&group_id=31650
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> > _______________________________________________
> > nant-developers mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to