Jarek, We eventually will need to generate the (Common)AssemblyInfo.cs from our build file (using the <asminfo> task), that would also resolve this issue ...
In order to accomplish this, we'll need a <version> task (similar to the one in NAntContrib) that can match the incrementing behaviour of the AssemblyVersionAttribute. So, we'll either need to create a new task (or function ofcourse) or extend the NAntContrib one ... Gert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-880233 ] Nant unit test fails > Gert! > > Regarding this ShowHelp issue: why don't we just disable the test and let's > (somehow) embed the build date into the NAnt.exe so that it displays in the > copyright banner. How about a #define that would be passed to <csc> ? > > Jarek > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SourceForge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:03 PM > Subject: [nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-880233 ] Nant unit test fails > > > > Bugs item #880233, was opened at 2004-01-20 00:25 > > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng > > You can respond by visiting: > > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=880233&group_id=31650 > > > > >Category: Tests > > >Group: 0.8.4.0 > > >Status: Closed > > >Resolution: Wont Fix > > Priority: 5 > > Submitted By: Nigel Thorne (nigelthorne) > > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > > Summary: Nant unit test fails > > > > Initial Comment: > > ShowHelp fails as it is year specific. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >Comment By: Gert Driesen (drieseng) > > Date: 2004-01-25 23:03 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=707851 > > > > This is a known "issue" in the 0.84 release (and all previous > > releases actually) as we have a unit test to ensure that we > > increment the copyright year. > > > > We still have to discuss how to proceed with this issue. > > > > Thanks for the report ! > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > You can respond by visiting: > > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=880233&group_id=31650 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > nant-developers mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > nant-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
