Hi, No I am running rpms from the beta 1 release. This is probably a silly question but what is the value of your framework directory setting in NAnt.exe.config? If there is a leading slash Path.Combine might be taking that as a root path.
Clayton > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: May 21, 2004 5:32 AM > To: Clayton Harbour > Cc: Gert Driesen; Giuseppe Greco; Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function > > > Hi Clayton, > Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same > result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed to > /usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll > investigate soem more. Ian > > > Clayton Harbour wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with > NAnt rebuilt > >this morning. There was some oddness with the install as the config > >file contained a reference to a "tasks" folder but the task binaries > >were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught something in > >mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install. > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > >Clayton > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM > >To: Giuseppe Greco > >Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers > >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NAnt Developers" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM > >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function > > > > > > > > > >>>Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just > >>> > >>> > >returned > > > > > >>>"1.0" ? > >>> > >>> > >>Yes, I do (of course, on Linux). > >>I've inserted the following task in one of my project files: > >> > >><echo > >> message="${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}" > >>/> > >> > >>... and the result is "1.0". > >> > >> > > > >Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my > >gentoo image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box .. > >shame on me ... blush :)) > > > >Gert > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > >Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > >10g. > >Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > >_______________________________________________ > >nant-developers mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Ian MacLean, Developer, > ActiveState, a division of Sophos > http://www.ActiveState.com > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
