>> - there's no such thing as AssemblyFolders for Mono/Unix, we >> could use them on Windows though ... > >I am not sure what AssemblyFolders are, is this related to the private bin path we are using for library resolution currently? If not then is there a way to simulate >this behavior and create Mono/Unix and Windows implementations that "do about the same thing"?
AsseblyFolders = aditional seatch paths for library resolution. Visual Studio uses registry for storing this and Nant read those entries but in Nant you could specify more search paths via <assemblyfolders> than those in registry. This functionality could be on Linux even more interesting than on Windows. Registry stuff should be simly skipped ( includevsfolders attribute) >> - not sure if we wil be able to use the HINTPATH on unix > >Again, the above might be possible. Not sure about this as well. I do not find hintpath useful at all ;-) Hintpath = path from where was reference created. So this is usually useful only on the same machine as project was created (reference added) and I think not many projects (.csprojs) are created on Linux... Regards, Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
