Gert,

Is there a more recent nightly build?   I try to stay up-to-date.
When I check the nightly builds, the most recent build that I see is
5/25/2004 which is what I'm having a problem with.

NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1606.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 5/25/2004)

Thanks,
Noel

 -----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Gert
Driesen
Sent:   Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:40 PM
To:     Noel Gifford; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: [nant-dev] .NET 1.0 build failed with current nant nightly

Noel,

There might have been an issue in that nightly build.  Do you get the same
issue in more recent nightly builds (there haven't been new nightly builds
for a while now, been too busy with Mono, but this will change soon) ?

Gert

----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel Gifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:27 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] .NET 1.0 build failed with current nant nightly


> All,
>
> I have a Windows Server 2003 that only has .NET 1.0 installed.
> It fails to execute the build file with the current nightly Nant build.
>
> You'll notice the second backslash (\\) between .NETFramework and
> sdkInstallRoot in the 0.85.1606.0 build.
> I looked in nant.exe.config but couldn't see where the problem is located.
>
> When is a new nightly build going to be done.  I notice that it's been
> awhile.
>
> Thanks,
> Noel
>
>
> D:\SitePackages\DeployToDEV>nant\bin\nant /f:Test.build
> NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1584.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 5/3/2004)
> Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw
> NAnt Team
>
> Buildfile: file:///D:/SitePackages/DeployToDEV/Test.build
> Target(s) specified: Default
>
> Default:
>
>      [echo] The Default target ran.
>
> BUILD SUCCEEDED
>
> Total time: 0.2 seconds.
>
>
> D:\SitePackages\DeployToDEV>nant.new\bin\nant /f:Test.build
> NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1606.0; net-1.0.win32; nightly; 5/25/2004)
> Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw
> NAnt Team
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> The current runtime framework 'net-1.1' is not correctly configured in the
> NAnt configuration file.
>     Registry Value Not Found! -
>
key='SOFTWARE\Microsoft\.NETFramework\\sdkInstallRootv1.1';hive='LocalMachin
> e';
>
> For more information regarding the cause of the build failure, run the
build
> again in debug mode.
>
> Try 'nant -help' for more information
>
>
> Build File used: Test.build
> ******************************************************************
> <project name="Test" default="Default">
>
>             <target name="Default">
>                         <echo message="The Default target ran." />
>             </target>
> </project>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
> one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
> evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to