>From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 6:08 AM
> Wouldn't it just be better (and more powerful) to have separate tasks, or > functions for this ? I'm not sure how you would design separate tasks or functions that don't subsume the current xmlpeek (and for that matter, xmlpoke) behaviors, in which case xmlpeek becomes unnecessary. I certainly believe that the basic mechanism for accessing an xml element should be the more or less the same regardless of whether or not the element is required, or whether or not it is allowed to be repeated. But perhaps you have something in mind that I just haven't considered. Gary ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
