good point! I put it in "assembly" in the patch, but now that you talk about "file", it sounds better. So I'd vote for file.
anyone else ?? On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:19:19 +0100, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère > > Sent: maandag 22 november 2004 23:09 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [nant-dev] is-assembly patch > > > > Here's a patch implementing function > > assembly::is-assembly(assemblyFilename). > > > > I didn't not test it very extensively, so feedback welcome. Especially > > I noticed (if I'm not wrong) undocumented behavior, as > > AssemblyName.GetAssemblyName seems to throw a FileLoadException > > sometimes, where msdn doesn't state this can happen. > > Should this be part of the assembly or file namespace (meaning > assembly::is-assembly or file::is-assembly) ? > > Gert > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
