I vote for the most simple form. Number 2 seems like it for me. But I want the "normal" parameters to be turned on by default. But my vote may not count, as I have not yet done my homework :) /Nicke
> -----Original Message----- > From: Clayton Harbour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 17 mars 2004 15:34 > To: Ian MacLean; Jaroslaw Kowalski > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] CVS update > > > Hi, > > Honestly I wouldn't really see a problem with using the same > syntax for the <csc/> task and that is one of the reasons > this thread started :-). > > > In any case that makes 2 for option 2 and if I stop sitting > on the fence, 2 for option 3. We need a tie breaker. > > > Clayton > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: March 17, 2004 1:45 AM > > To: Jaroslaw Kowalski > > Cc: Clayton Harbour; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] CVS update > > > > > > I'd have to say 2 also. Forcing users to use the nested > > <globaloptions> > > and <commandoptions> for even the simplest actions seems way too > > verbose. Imagine if you had to do > > <csc> > > <commandoptions> > > <option name="foo" value="true"/> > > <option name="bar" value="true"/> > > </commandoptions> > > > > to compile using csc ? > > > > Ian > > > > > > Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > > > > >My vote is 2 (but make sure that "extraoptions" is needed in <5% > > >cases). > > > > > >Jarek > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin Dickover" > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Scott > > >Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean" > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:55 AM > > >Subject: RE: [Nant-users] CVS update > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>-1000 for the framework idea :-). Okay I am going to try > to put my > > >>bruised ego aside and pull something constructive from this :-). > > >> > > >>Framework aside for now the issue is: what syntax do you prefer: > > >> > > >>1) option collections (current): > > >><cvs-update globaloptions="-nt" > > >>commandoptions="-r VERSION_FOO" ...... > > > >><globaloptions> > > >><option name="readonly" value="true"/> > > >></globaloptions> > > >><commandoptions> > > >><option name="pergeempty" > > >>value="false"/> > > >><option name="newdirs" value="false"/> > > >></commandoptions> > > >><fileset> > > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > > >></fileset> > > >></cvs-update> > > >> > > >>2) attributes: > > >><cvs-update purgeempty="true" > > >>newdirs="false" > > >>overwritelocal="true" > > >>extraoptions="-D ..."> > > >><fileset> > > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > > >></fileset> > > >></cvs-update> > > >> > > >>3) nested commands with attributes: > > >><cvs cvsroot="{$CVSROOT}" rootprefix="{$CVSROOTPREFIX}" > > >>readonly="true"> <update pruneEmpty="true" > > >>buildDirectories="true" recursive="true"> > > >><fileset> > > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > > >></fileset> > > >></update> > > >></cvs> > > >> > > >>4) I don't care, just quit spamming my mailbox and tell > me when you > > >>are done. > > >> > > >> > > >>My vote is either for 1 or 3. Please let me know what your > > preference > > >>is, if you have one. > > >> > > >> > > >>Cheers, > > >> > > >> > > >>Clayton > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President > > and CEO of > > >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > > >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Nant-users mailing list > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ian MacLean, Developer, > > ActiveState, a division of Sophos > > http://www.ActiveState.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President > and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from > fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Nant-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/n> ant-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
