To be honest - I don't see the need for a task to wrap nunit-console and the
like (e.g. ncover.console.exe).
As Bob states - just use an exec task to invoke the console application.
I have created a simple .build file which depending upon parameters supplied
will use exec to invoke typemock and ncover with the correct params to also
call nunit for a combined unit test / code coverage profile run - this
script also adapts the command line whether typemock is linked or not....
This works well for me and I only have to supply directories for
nunit/ncover and typemock if I am not using PATH.
<project name="integration.codecoverage" default="codecoverage">
<!-- required property values -->
<property name="integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory" value=""
overwrite="false"/>
<!-- required property values -->
<!-- overridable property values -->
<property name="integration.codecoverage.typemock.path"
value="C:\Program Files\TypeMock\TypeMock.Net\" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.typemock.console"
value="tmockrunner.exe" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.typemock.profilername"
value="NCover1.5.7" />
<property name="integration.codecoverage.typemock.islinked"
value="true" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.ncover.path"
value="C:\Program Files\NCover\" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.ncover.console"
value="ncover.console.exe" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.ncover.console.assemblies"
value="SCLtd.NAnt.Extensions.Tasks" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.nunitproject"
value="SCLtd.NAnt.Extensions" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.nunitconfig" value="Debug"
overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.nunit.path"
value="C:\Program Files\Nunit 2.2.9\bin\" overwrite="false"/>
<property name="integration.codecoverage.nunit.console"
value="nunit-console.exe" overwrite="false"/>
<!-- overridable property values -->
<!-- explicit property values -->
<!-- explicit property values -->
<target name="codecoverage" depends="integration.codecoverage" />
<target name="integration.codecoverage" description="">
<echo
message="integration.codecoverage.typemock.islinked=${integration.codecovera
ge.typemock.islinked}" />
<if
test="${property::get-value('integration.codecoverage.typemock.islinked') ==
'true'}">
<echo
message="workingdir=${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory}" />
<echo
message="program=${integration.codecoverage.ncover.path}${integration.codeco
verage.ncover.console}" />
<echo message="commandline=//w
${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory} //x
${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NCoverResults.xml
${integration.codecoverage.nunit.path}${integration.codecoverage.nunit.conso
le} ${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.nunit
/config=${integration.codecoverage.nunitconfig}
/xml=${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NUnitResults.xml //a
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.console.assemblies}" />
<exec
workingdir="${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory}"
program="${integration.codecoverage.ncover.path}${integration.codecoverage.n
cover.console}"
commandline="//w
${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory} //x
${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NCoverResults.xml
${integration.codecoverage.nunit.path}${integration.codecoverage.nunit.conso
le} ${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.nunit
/config=${integration.codecoverage.nunitconfig}
/xml=${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NUnitResults.xml //a
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.console.assemblies}"
/>
</if>
<if
test="${property::get-value('integration.codecoverage.typemock.islinked') ==
'false'}">
<echo
message="workingdir=${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory}" />
<echo
message="program=${integration.codecoverage.typemock.path}${integration.code
coverage.typemock.console}" />
<echo message="commandline=-link
${integration.codecoverage.typemock.profilername}
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.path}${integration.codecoverage.ncover.con
sole} //w ${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory} //x
${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NCoverResults.xml
${integration.codecoverage.nunit.path}${integration.codecoverage.nunit.conso
le} ${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.nunit
/config=${integration.codecoverage.nunitconfig}
/xml=${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NUnitResults.xml //a
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.console.assemblies}" />
<exec
workingdir="${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory}"
program="${integration.codecoverage.typemock.path}${integration.codecoverage
..typemock.console}"
commandline="-link
${integration.codecoverage.typemock.profilername}
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.path}${integration.codecoverage.ncover.con
sole} //w ${integration.codecoverage.workingdirectory} //x
${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NCoverResults.xml
${integration.codecoverage.nunit.path}${integration.codecoverage.nunit.conso
le} ${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.nunit
/config=${integration.codecoverage.nunitconfig}
/xml=${integration.codecoverage.nunitproject}.NUnitResults.xml //a
${integration.codecoverage.ncover.console.assemblies}"
/>
</if>
</target>
</project>
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Driesen
Sent: 03 May 2007 14:52
To: Bob Archer; Erich Eichinger; nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi Bob,
I've been planning on adding an nunit-console task would be basically just
be wrapper around nunit-console.exe.
The only advantage would be that the nunit-console task can automatically
invoke the nunit-console assembly and set the environment for the current
target framework.
Would something like this be useful ?
Gert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erich Eichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Nothing against Nant. But, this is the reason a lot of people recommend
running NUnit with the exec task.
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich
Eichinger
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 1:56 AM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [NAnt-users] NUnit NAnt task roadmap
Hi,
Since NUnit 2.4 is already out, I'd like to know if there are any concrete
plans to upgrade/extend the nunit task to the new version. As far as I could
see, the nunit task is still compiled against 2.2.8.
cheers,
Erich
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express
> C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No
> limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> _______________________________________________
> NAnt-users mailing list
> NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the
FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just
data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
***********************************************************************************
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered
Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the
addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other
than the addressee, please return the message to the sender
by replying to it and then delete the message from your
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for
changes made to this message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this
message and any attachments will not adversely affect its
systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry
out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
Visit our websites at:
www.rbs.com
www.rbsgc.com
www.rbsmarkets.com
***********************************************************************************
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
