Hey Ian,
Yeah, we're using sgv basically as the vss replacement. It (vss) was just too darn
slow over the vpn, but with a replacement we wanted to give those developers using
vs.net the familiar vss feel with sgv's vs.net add-ins. The windows forms sgv client
is also pretty good -- all of the threading/population bugs that I've seen in 1.0 have
apparently been fixed in 1.1. A nice replacement for those of us who won't use
vs.net, but also want to be able to quickly see our pending check-ins at the end of
the day :)
I haven't had any major issues with their client api yet, either.
Anyhow, I guess I will start <sgvget> and see how it goes. How do you usually take
contributions? Couldn't find much on the site.
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/22/2003 10:18 AM
To: Ryan Duffield
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NAntC-Dev] Vault tasks
Ryan,
Sounds great. I don't use vault personally but it looks a whole lot
nicer than using sourcesafe. The pricing isn't too bad either. Its also
got a nice managed client interface doesn't it ?
Ian
>Hi,
>
>Is there any interest in Vault tasks, similar to the VSS ones? I'd love to
port my custom app that we use for our automated builds to native NAnt tasks, instead
of using exec :)
>
>Ryan
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
>With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
>WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
>same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
>_______________________________________________
>NAntContrib-Developer mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nantcontrib-developer
>
>
�+w�zf��+,��좷�o%LY��Z+aT��쨹Ƨ���[b�W���ڶ)�+-zk(��"� ^��!�w�!1�Q4D�
ь���Z)ݣ?6�ޖ[�ۚ�f��)ޱ�m����b��ky�k��\�'$��ކ�i��0���j���o��}��ߎ��'�*'���
�ޖ�^�f��)��+-4 �
���&�z��+-��.�ǟ����a��l��b��,���y�+���b��?�+-�w��v���'���u�ޖ�^