+1 on the backported changes.
> On Feb 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> I see you've already obtained CCC approval for JDK 8u. Approved but subject
> to peer code review.
>
> Regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 25/02/2016 11:31, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/25/2016 5:01 PM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
>>> Please approve the following backport:
>>>
>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148379
>>> jdk9 review thread:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2016-February/005973.html
>>> jdk8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8148379/8u/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> the patch wouldn't apply 'as is' (apart from source layout changes). I had
>>> to do manual merge in two files:
>>>
>>> build.xml:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8148379/8u/webrev.00/make/build.xml.udiff.html
>>>
>>> -- because jdk8u build.xml and jdk9-dev build.xml are different now and
>>> hence line numbers don't match
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8148379/8u/webrev.00/src/jdk/nashorn/api/scripting/AbstractJSObject.java.udiff.html
>>>
>>> -- 8u source is slightly different.
>>>
>>> I'm cc'ing nashorn-dev alias as well.
>>>
>>> -Sundar
>>
>
