It’s an intentional change, see
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144020
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144020>.
Attila.
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 18:30, Frantzius, Jörg <joerg.frantz...@aperto.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have a JUnit test that first evaluates a Javascript file containing this:
>
> function add(a, b) {
> return a + b;
> }
>
> The Java JUnit test itself then evaluates
>
> engine.eval("add(4, 5)")
>
> Just until 1.8.0_91, this used to return a 9L Long number. With 1.8.0_101,
> this suddenly returns a Double object 9D.
>
> When directly evaluating the addition operation:
>
> eval("4 + 5")
>
> an Integer 9 is returned, both with 1.8.0_101 and 1.8.0_91.
>
> Is this intended behaviour, or is this a bug?
>
> Thx for responses + regards,
> Jörg
>
>
> ---
>
> Dipl. Inf. Jörg von Frantzius, Technical Director
>
> E-Mail joerg.frantz...@aperto.com
>
> Phone +49 30 283921-318
> Fax +49 30 283921-29
>
> Aperto AG – An IBM Company
> Chausseestraße 5, D-10115 Berlin
> http://www.aperto.com<http://www.aperto.de/>
> http://www.facebook.com/aperto
> https://www.xing.com/companies/apertoag
>
> HRB 77049 B, AG Berlin Charlottenburg
> Vorstand: Dirk Buddensiek (Vorsitzender), Kai Großmann, Stephan Haagen,
> Daniel Simon
> Aufsichtsrat: Matthew Candy (Vorsitzender)
>
