+1; good work. I'm kinda embarrassed I didn’t think of this case… Attila.
> On 30 Sep 2016, at 18:18, Marcus Lagergren <mar...@lagergren.net> wrote: > > +1. Good catch, Hannes! > > /M > >> On 30 Sep 2016, at 16:46, Hannes Wallnöfer <hannes.wallnoe...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >> Please review 8166902: Nested object literal property maps not reset in >> optimistic recompilation: >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166902 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8166902/webrev.00/ >> >> The original assumption was that the property map only has to be replaced in >> the top level object literal when optimistic recompilation happens within a >> nested object literal. However, recompilation may also create different maps >> on parent object literals as more information about types may be available. >> >> Thanks, >> Hannes >
