The type is ScriptFunction, I've created a simple reproducer that I've
pushed to https://github.com/jesseschulman/JSObject_gets_ScriptFunction
<https://github.com/jesseschulman/JSObject_gets_ScriptFunction.git>
Thanks!
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:05 AM Sundararajan Athijegannathan <
sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
> what is the type of args[0]? Can you print args[0].getClass() to check it?
>
> Thanks,
> -Sundar
>
>
> On 24/08/17, 9:14 AM, Jesse Schulman wrote:
>
> I did try running with -Dnashorn.apply2call=false when I saw the email for
> that fix but it did not resolve the issue.
>
> There is no exception thrown, but our JSObject.call method basically is
> no-op as a result of not getting a ScriptObjectMirror, it effectively looks
> like this:
>
> @Override
> public Object call(Object thiz, Object ... args) {
> if (args.length < 2 || !(args[0] instanceof
> ScriptObjectMirror) || !((ScriptObjectMirror) args[0]).isFunction() ||
> !(args[1] instanceof Integer))
> return gScriptEnvironment.getUndefined();
>
> // safely cast and call ScriptObjectMirror...
> }
>
>
> I am continuing to work on reproducing it outside our application in a
> simple way. In the mean time if there's any other information I can share
> besides a reproducing example, or suggestions on workarounds to try let me
> know.
>
> Thanks!
> Jesse
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:10 PM Sundararajan Athijegannathan <
> sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the delayed response. We need more info to debug this - in
>> particular, what is the exception (if any) thrown etc.
>>
>> I wonder if this is related to this recent apply-related fix ->
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nashorn-dev/2017-August/006998.html
>>
>> -Sundar
>>
>> On 22/08/17, 3:43 AM, Jesse Schulman wrote:
>> > This does not happen on the first run of the code but is consistently
>> > happening on the 17th run after a restart and from that point forward is
>> > broken until we restart.
>> >
>> > Attached is a broken and working call stack.
>> >
>> > I have tried to replicate what we are doing in a basic java reproducer
>> but
>> > have not been able to do so, given that I can consistently reproduce
>> this
>> > locally I am happy to take any suggested steps to gather more
>> information
>> > or to workaround/resolve the issue.
>> >
>> > Environment:
>> > Java version 1.8.144
>> > Engine created with "--no-java", "-strict", "--no-syntax-extensions",
>> > "--language=es6", "--optimistic-types=true" (also tried with
>> > optimistic-types=false)
>> > All evaluation done on the same engine via engine.eval(String, Bindings)
>> > using a Bindings that was returned from engine.createBindings, each of
>> the
>> > "runs" described above took place in a different Bindings instance
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Jesse
>>
>
