+1

Hannes

> Am 13.12.2017 um 21:19 schrieb Attila Szegedi <szege...@gmail.com>:
> 
> I updated the webrev with @bug and @summary in the tests: 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8193296/webrev.02.jdk> 
> 
> Attila.
> 
>> On Dec 11, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan 
>> <sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 1) @bug and @summary are for documentation purpose - explain what the test 
>> is all about (without having to look at JIRA...)
>> 
>> 2) @modules is needed only if you want to add module exports for internal 
>> packages from other modules to your test (equivalent to --add-exports in 
>> java command line). That is not needed in this case (because you use only 
>> exported API packages from jdk.dynalink module).
>> 
>> -Sundar
>> 
>> On 11/12/17, 4:55 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> I admittedly cribbed the various @tags from the neighboring 
>>> JDK_8188098_Test class :-). I take it “@run testng …” is meaningful and 
>>> understood by jtreg then, so I can leave that as it is? I tried to find 
>>> other examples and stumbled upon e.g. JDK_8184723_Test which specifies 
>>> “@run main/othervm” and also declares “@modules” - is that something I 
>>> should be doing as well, and can you advice what would be the correct 
>>> values?
>>> 
>>> Attila.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 11, 2017, at 8:18 AM, Sundararajan 
>>>> Athijegannathan<sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> * Test misses copyright comment
>>>> * you may want to add @bug<bug_id>  and @summary line in jtreg comment 
>>>> section
>>>> 
>>>> Other than that, +1
>>>> 
>>>> -Sundar
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/12/17, 9:52 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>>>>> Please review JDK-8193296 "Parser should not eagerly transform delete 
>>>>> expressions" 
>>>>> at<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8193296/webrev.jdk<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8193296/webrev.jdk>>
>>>>>    
>>>>> for<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193296<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193296>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Attila.
>>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to