>> if an implementation of gethostbyname() works that way, it's broken, and >> it's breaking its applications. > Oops. > I wanted to say connect-by-name (as before) rather than gethostbyname. > (And I may have to learn more about socket APIs before pursuing the > subject.) > Apologies for this.
Actually, I assumed you meant getaddrinfo() rather than gethostbyname(), since getaddrinfo() actually has arguments to specify the transport protocol and port which would allow a broken implementation of the API to do a SRV lookup. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
