Replying only to NAT66, as this concerns NAT66. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Rémi Després > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:44 PM > To: [email protected]; Shara > Subject: [shara] draft-despres-sam-02 > > Hi, > > Here is, below, draft-02 of the SAM document which was ready > too late to be posted before IETF 74. > > - Sections 2, 3.5, 4.1 and 5 are particularly focused on > subjects that concern the 6AI-NAT66 BOF. > > - Its section 3.7, and is particularly focused on the subject > of the SHARA BOF, and the example of section 4.2 is related to it. > > All comments are most welcome.
(For reference, this is regarding the document at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nat66/current/msg00106.html which is not in the Internet Draft archives). In Section 5, "SAM as an alternative to NATs in IPv6", reads in part: 1. In a private-addressing IPv6 site, hosts can know their global addresses to use them in e2e packets that are encapsulated in local packets to traverse the site. Renumbering is then automated simply by automating advertisement of SAM parameter changes (in DHCP and/or with router advertisements). If a site is multi-homed, the SAM-capable IPv6 host would need to be configured with two SAM addresses -- much like IPv6 multi-homing today, correct? -d _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
