> And I think about the issues that using a link-local address in a > non-NAT'd environment brings into play.
trying to use a link-local address with a NAT is even more insane. > I think the ULA would be orders of magnitude simpler than trying to use > link-local in a non-local scope. really. simpler for whom? _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
