I've a feeling that NAT66 complicates the bootstrap process for P2PSIP overlays, but I'm not sure how. I don't think I see how P2PSIP bootstrap servers can be deployed behind NAT66 without tightly coupled coordination with the NAT, and I wonder about Fred's ideas about hairpin denial in that case...
If ever there were a good time to deprecate a protocol it'd be now for SIP (and any other application that embeds its IP in the payload with no accomodations for address translation). Otherwise you're really just patching one bad design on another. IAX2 would be a natural replacement in the IPv6 world, if the IETF would stop sitting on it. IMO, Roger Marquis _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
