Tony Hain wrote:
In any case, the 66nat effort is a solution looking for a problem, but if it
does exist it should be based on technical rather than policy issues.
Can we develop a list of techincal issues that are drivers for IPv6NATs?
Address Independence
and multihoming?
Topology hiding
Address Amplification
Is this tied into prefix allocations or is this a separate one?
And what else?
Then we define what each means and offer solutions today for them.
BTW, I am working on a non-NAT proposal for topology hiding (not
discussing what your internal network structure is). There is a general
solution and specific solution paths with existing host technology. Do
have some serious issues to munch on still. It might also address
address amplification, but am not sure.
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
