Hi,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:55:47AM +0200, Rémi Després wrote:
> IPv6 has been extensively deployed by Free in France since december 2007, and
> later by SoftBank in Japan, without NAT66.
> This is enough, in my understanding, to contradict that NAT66 is a
> "prerequisite to IPv6 uptake".
Different target customers. For "end user" customers, NAT66 is no longer
needed or desirable - but Petra (in this thread) is talking about medium
sized enterprises that do not want a slot in the global routing table,
and at the same time want to be multihomed to multiple providers, and
*not* have multiple /64s on every LAN in the enterprise.
> Besides, breaking e2e address transparency is the worse that can happen
> to discourage people to deploy and use IPv6.
Enterprises do not want e2e transparency regarding their networks - they
want well-controlled and well-regulated communications, managed by a
border gateway device (call it firewall, nat box, ...).
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
