On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Christian Huitema wrote: > >> There was a long thread about this issue when we discussed the simple >> security model, so I am pretty sure that some people do care. They may or >> may not be misguided. I am ready to believe that you know better than them. >> But then, there is a long history of know-nothing not following the IETF >> designs... > > I guess my biggest comment is one I made about two years ago. > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/73/slides/behave-14.pdf
I should have said which slide it was. Slide 33. > I would recommend that people that implement this technology also implement > an optional stateful firewall, so that people can turn it on. They might > consider referring to > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security > "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment > for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service", James Woodyatt, > 21-Oct-10 > > which is in the RFC Editor's inbox. > _______________________________________________ > nat66 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66 _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
