Le 1 nov. 2010 à 20:20, Gert Doering a écrit : > Because none of the "I wanna have NAT!!!" "professionals" has undergone > the effort of actually writing a draft?
A stateful NAT66 is the same as a NAT44 with the code extended to work with IPv6 addresses. Maybe a draft would be useful to say it. But for the sake of expressing interest, or lack of, can't this common sense definition be sufficient? Regards, RD _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
