At 13:59 16/12/2010, Rémi Després wrote:
But it isn't what RFCs that specify link layer protocols say.
Could you not help in being more specific ? We need to know what we will certainly intend to disregard and how we will do it. As users was we are not interested in IPv6 as such, we are interested in a nat46/66 64 bits unconstrained addressing space, it being agnostic to any internet/non-internet technology and IPv4/IPv6 addressing plan.
jfc _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
