On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 00:38 -0500, Steven Blake wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:58 -0800, Dan Wing wrote: > > > Thanks for forwarding a pointer to that document. > > > > You might also see RFC5508, "NAT Behavioral Requirements for ICMP". > > RFC5508 includes a reference to ICMP Extensions (RFC4884) which, while > > rare in the wild, are probably worth describing so they are handled > > properly. Hairpinning of ICMP messages may also be worth pointing out > > to implementers (so that pinging the 'external' address works, among > > other things). It might be worth also pointing out that ICMP echo > > request/reply doesn't require special handling. > > Thanks for the pointers Dan. I was unaware of RFCs 5508 and 4884. We > will take a look and revise as you suggest.
Hi Dan, I just submitted http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-blake-nptv6-icmp-02 today. I hope that it addresses your comments. If there are no more review comments on the draft, we will request publication as an individual submission. Regards, // Steve _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
