And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Puget Sound shellfish growers ask High Court to settle
                             access issues
              http://www.indiancountry.com/NW31.html                        
                              By Cate Montana
                             Today correspondent
                                      
                                      

                SHELTON, Wash. - Commercial shellfish growers and concerned
private
               landowners hope the U.S. Supreme Court will decide to hear
their appeal of
               September's 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision allowing
Puget Sound
               tribes access to private tidelands to harvest shellfish. 
                 
               In an interpretation of the 1855 Steven's treaty fishing
clause, the lower court
               ruled tribes may enter private tidelands and property to
harvest half the
               shellfish from uncultivated beds. Commercial growers say the
decision will
               have a devastating economic impact on business and are
appealing to the
               highest court in the land. 
                 
               Tribal reaction to the Supreme Court appeal has been matter
of fact. "This
               appeal was not unexpected," said Nooksak Fisheries director,
Bob Kelly. 
                 
               According to Bill Dewey, spokesman for the Puget Sound
Shellfish Growers
               Association, the appeal is a last-ditch effort to save, what
is for the most part,
               small family-owned businesses that have been run in the
tidelands for
               generations. 

               Ramifications 

                One of the main arguments of the appeal that would have
enormous
               repercussions in Indian country if ruled upon, is the
application of the legal
               principle of laches to treaties. 
                 
               Laches is the historic equivalent of a property-rights
statute of limitations: If
               someone waits too long to bring suit, they lose their claim
or right to sue,
               especially when the other party knows nothing about the
claim and has
               improved the property in question. 
                 
               The growers are asking the court to decide if it is fair to
wait 135 years to
               bring this claim, when no other citizen has such a right and
growers built these
               farms from scratch without any notice of a claim in all of
that time. 
                 
               The U.S Supreme Court declined 5 to 4, to rule on the
applicability of laches
               to treaty claims in a 1985 decision between the County of
Oneida vs. the
               Oneida Nation, because it opens up the huge issue of whether
tribes can
               legally continue to file suits to implement treaty rights in
areas where their
               rights are still being denied. <<END EXCERPT
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to