And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:34:54 -0700 From: Tom Schlosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Morisset Schlosser Ayer & Jozwiak, 801 2nd Ave., Ste. 1115, Seattle, WA 98104, 206 386 5200, (206 386 7322 fax) http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/05/cyber/articles/28domain.html -- What's happening? See http://msaj.com/forum.htm May 28, 1999 Internet Board Backs Rules to Limit Cybersquatters By JERI CLAUSING [T] he board of the Internet's new oversight organization on Thursday endorsed a controversial set of recommendations for cracking down on so-called cybersquatters, who register trademarks and other popular words as Internet addresses. Esther Dyson, interim chairman of the organization, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, emphasized that the board's endorsement merely affirmed the broader principles of the recommendations, which were issued last month by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an arm of the United Nations. Many of the details, she said, would be open to amendment. The board deferred final adoption of the recommendations until they can be reviewed by one of ICANN's newly formed member groups. Absent from that group, however, is the constituency that critics say have the most to lose under the recommendations: individuals and non-commercial interests who have already registered Internet addresses and could have them taken away. Like everything surrounding the Clinton Administration's process for handing administration of the Internet to ICANN, the board's action was immediately criticized as contrary to its charge to be a "bottom's up" organization and follow the lead of its worldwide constituents. Brian O'Shaughnessy, a spokesman for Network Solutions Inc., which has held an exclusive government contract for registering names in the top-level domains of .com, .net and org since 1993, said after Thursday's action that ICANN was envisioned "as a limited standard-setting body which is consensus based." But he said that when the board begins making such decisions, "It's top down instead of bottoms up." A. Michael Froomkin, a University of Miami law professor who advised WIPO on the recommendations and who has been critical of some of its major provisions, called the ICANN action surprising and unnecessary "Why are they endorsing things before they send them to the supporting organization for review? " he asked. The unanimous endorsement of the principles by ICANN's board came during an eight-hour closed board meeting in Berlin, where the board also finalized a $5.9 million budget that will be financed in part by a $1 a year fee on every domain name registered and on fees and dues from companies ICANN approves to begin competing with Network Solutions. In addition, the board approved the structure of two of three supporting groups that will make up the nonprofit corporation's membership. One of those three is the Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO), which has been charged with making recommendations to ICANN on how and when to add new top-level domains like .com to the global network. Its first order of business, however, is to carry out rules governing the registration of domain names. Specifically, ICANN asked the new group to begin drafting a plan on how to move forward with the WIPO recommendations. "It's clear that this is urgent so we sent that right to the DNSO saying that we basically support the WIPO report but there are issues about how to implement it," Dyson said. The WIPO proposal has been criticized as favoring trademark holders and wealthy corporate interests over small businesses, nonprofit groups and individual Internet users. Although the board action is an official endorsement of the WIPO principals, Dyson said the recommendations are still "very much" open for change by the domain name supporting organization. But that group is still lacking one of its seven constituencies: the group that is supposed to represent individual and non-commercial domain name holders. The other six constituencies - representing groups like trademark holders, registries and Internet service providers - were approved by the board Thursday. "These guys are stragglers," Dyson said. "They basically did not come together with a proposal. We hope to have that resolved in June. We told them to come back to us." Despite the missing link, Dyson said the DNSO has been asked to begin work immediately on the WIPO report so that the board can adopt some of its provisions at its next board meeting in Santiago, Chile, in August. -------------------------- Froomkin said he The WIPO proposal has found the seeming been criticized as sense of urgency favoring trademark to adopt the holders. report troubling. -------------------------- "To start a process where the interim board has 'endorsed' this, then send it to a group that is missing the most important counterweight ... is not a process that is likely to create a lot of legitimacy for ICANN," Froomkin said. ICANN on Thursday also accepted an application for the Protocol Supporting Organization, which will deal with more technical aspects of the Internet's architecture. It expects to formally recognize a third group, the Address Supporting Organization in Santiago. Thursday's board meeting - the third formal meeting of the interim ICANN board -- followed a daylong public hearing where the board took comment on all of the items on its closed meeting agenda. It also discussed the progress, or lack thereof, in opening the domain name registration business to competition. ICANN was formed last year to take over the administrative functions of the Internet that previously were conducted by government contractors and to open the registration process to competition. Last month it chose the first five companies to test a shared registration system built by Network Solutions. The test phase officially began April 26, but none of the five companies has yet been able to go live and begin registering names in the top-level domains of .com, .net and org. Ken Stubbs, who represents the only nonprofit entity participating in the test, the Internet Council of Registrars, complained to the board that important software from Network Solutions does not work, and that the non-disclosure agreement Network Solutions made the test participants sign prohibits them from discussing the test problems with ICANN. Dyson said she was disturbed by Stubbs comments. "My goal had been for the test to be a source of information not just for the people directly involved in the test but for everyone who wants to be a registrar down the road," she said. O'Shaughnessy said the non-disclosure agreement was a standard contract meant to protect the company's proprietary information. "There is nothing particularly unique about it," he said. "They are holding it up as if it's restrictive, but it's a standard NDA. The reason the test information has not yet been shared with ICANN is simple, O'Shaughnessy said: "ICANN hasn't signed the non-disclosure agreement." --------------------------------------------- Jeri Clausing at [EMAIL PROTECTED] welcomes your comments and suggestions. Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company Reprinted under the fair use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine of international copyright law. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit) Unenh onhwa' Awayaton http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/ &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
