And now:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        by imo15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id o.0.a7831f08 (4001)
         for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 18:23:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 18:23:42 EST
Subject: 'DIPITY Three Strikes Law/Crusade On To Alter Tough Law

[EMAIL PROTECTED] replies:
Crusade is on to alter tough law 
  http://www.uniontribune.com/news/metro/991114-0010_1m14strikes.html
  (entire story at above Link)

  Families call lengthy prison sentences unfair
By Michael Stetz 
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER 
November 14, 1999 

This is what Patsy Knights is asking, and she knows she is asking a lot:

She wants you to feel for criminals.

She wants you to feel for her son.

Her son, a former high school football and track star.

Her son, the young man she would later see in the streets, disheveled and on 
drugs.

Her son, Christopher Roberts, sentenced in 1995 under California's "three 
strikes" law after being convicted of taking part in an assault and armed 
robbery.

It put him behind bars for 135 years to life.

Here, the North Park woman pauses.

She takes a breath.

Her son did wrong, she says.

He should pay.

"But let the punishment fit the crime," said Knights, who has started a San 
Diego chapter of a statewide organization called Families to Amend 
California's Three Strikes, or FACTS.

The law is a get-tough, controversial one that supporters say has drastically 
reduced crime in California by getting career criminals off the street.

They argue that it's a critical weapon in the war against violent crime.

Someone with two past convictions for serious or violent felonies, such as 
murder, rape or burglary, gets a minimum sentence of 25 years to life if 
convicted of a third offense.

The last strike doesn't have to be a violent one, though. The law can apply 
if a repeat felon commits a petty crime, such as shoplifting or possession of 
a small amount of drugs.

It can also double the prison sentence of a person with one strike who 
commits a fresh felony.

FACTS wants the law changed so that the third strike has to be a violent or 
serious one, to ensure it snares violent offenders only.

Knights' fight is spurred not just by her son's plight, she said. Any reform 
-- which is unlikely, experts say, given society's hard-line attitude against 
criminals -- will do him little good. Roberts' last strike was violent.

Knights, a retired Los Angeles County employee and Mesa College graduate, 
says changes can occur if people learn more about the law and its 
implications.

The law has had overwhelming public support. In 1994, more than 70 percent of 
California voters endorsed it as a ballot proposition.

And that support remains strong -- if the last strike is for a violent 
offense -- according to a survey released only days ago by the University of 
California Riverside.

More than 90 percent of those polled said the law should apply to those 
committing a third violent felony. But that support fell significantly when 
people were asked if the punishment should apply to those convicted of drug 
and property crimes.

Also, last week, a University of California Berkeley law professor released a 
study that argued the law has not been a deterrent. He tracked felony arrests 
in three large California cities, including San Diego, before and after the 
law's enactment and found no significant changes.

Knights is not the only resident of the San Diego region fighting the law.

Vista's Tye Smith recently started a similar chapter in North County. Her 
son, Josh, is serving a two-year state prison sentence for robbery and 
burglary. While the sentence doesn't seem harsh, he racked up two strikes 
from the crimes as a result of a plea bargain that spared him the possibility 
of a longer prison sentence.

One more strike and he could be out. He is 19.

"If he writes one bad check ... ." Smith said.

Knights and others say voters who approved the law are getting more than they 
bargained for: crowded prisons, more tax revenue earmarked for prison 
construction, and an angrier and more disenchanted prison population.

"It's doing no good, no good at all."

Others disagree.

Supporters say three strikes has been a key factor in the 28 percent drop in 
the crime rate the San Diego region has witnessed over the past few years.

They dismissed the recent academic study, saying criminals are in tune with 
the law and are leaving California rather than risking arrest.

Many prosecutors say it has sent a message: Habitual crime will not be 
tolerated.
<SNIP>  Entire article at Link above
   
Reprinted under the Fair Use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine 
of international copyright law.
                  <><<<<<>>>>><><<<<>
           Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                   http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
                  <><<<<<>>>>><><<<<>
                              

Reply via email to